文章正文

家族诞生

Chinese expert warns Philippines not to mistake humanitarian accommodation for concession as Philippine military twists facts on Ren’ai Jiao resupply_我的网站

少年

A |     中新网北京8月24日电(记者 李京统)近日,河北张家口康保县部分大白菜在装车前蘸取甲醛溶液保鲜的视频引发舆论关注。    

Screenshot from video obtained by the Global Times on July 21, 2026 shows the transfer of injured Philippine personnel near Ren'ai Jiao, which was overseen and assisted by the China Coast Guard. Photo: Courtesy of the China Coast Guard
    Screenshot from video obtained by the Global Times on July 21, 2026 shows the transfer of injured Philippine personnel near Ren'ai Jiao, which was overseen and assisted by the China Coast Guard. Photo: Courtesy of the China Coast GuardThe Philippine military side has again claimed that resupplying its grounded warship at Ren'ai Jiao needs no foreign approval and resupply there is within its self-claimed so-called EEZ, while Philippine media acknowledged that 15 "safe" resupply missions were made over the past two years under a China-Philippines provisional arrangement. 
Chinese experts warned on Wednesday that Manila should not mistake humanitarian accommodation for a concession and must bear the consequences if it scraps the arrangement.
Yang Xiao, a research fellow at the Institute of Peaceful Development under the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences, told the Global Times on Wednesday that the Philippine side's claims are fundamentally flawed from legal, historical and practical perspectives. 
Ren'ai Jiao is an inherent part of China's Nansha Qundao, over which China has indisputable and complete sovereignty, Yang said, adding that it is legally untenable for the Philippines to claim that Ren'ai Jiao is part of its exclusive economic zone.
"The Philippines deliberately grounded the abandoned warship at Ren'ai Jiao in 1999 and repeatedly pledged to remove it and restore the reef, but has failed to honor those commitments for more than two decades. This itself constitutes a continuing violation of China's territorial sovereignty," Yang said. 
This is not the first time the Philippines has denied seeking China's approval for resupply missions to Ren'ai Jiao. In April 2025, Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesperson Guo Jiakun responded to similar claims, saying that China's position on how to handle the current situation at Ren'ai Jiao is clear and consistent.
"First, by keeping its warship grounded at Ren'ai Jiao for decades running, the Philippines has been violating China's sovereignty and the Declaration on the Conduct of Parties in the South China Sea (DOC). We demand that the Philippines tow away the warship. Second, between now and when the warship is towed away, should the Philippines need to send living necessities, China is willing to allow it in a humanitarian spirit if the Philippines informs China in advance and after on-site verification is conducted. Third, if the Philippines were to send large amount of construction materials to the warship and attempt to build fixed facilities or permanent outpost, China will absolutely not accept it and will resolutely stop it in accordance with the law and regulations," said the spokesperson.
"This means that the Philippines' so-called '15 safe and incident-free resupply missions' were all made possible by China's humanitarian accommodation and strict oversight," Yang stressed. Each mission was reported in advance and allowed to proceed only after inspections confirmed no prohibited construction materials were aboard. The CCG intercepted any such materials through lawful measures, Yang said.
The Philippines' unilateral denial of its notification and inspection obligations while enjoying the arrangement's benefits amounts to a blatant breach of its commitments, the expert noted.
Yang also noted that Manila's narrative contains an obvious logical contradiction. If Philippine resupply missions were truly unimpeded, there would be no need for Manila to repeatedly claim that China had "blocked" its missions and call for international intervention. Yet if China had continuously "obstructed" the missions, the Philippines could not have completed 15 safe and incident-free resupply operations. 
"Manila has simply manipulated its narrative to suit its publicity needs, portraying itself as a 'victim' when seeking international attention while touting smooth resupply operations and its own strength when seeking to project toughness. Its hype over the 15 resupply missions is essentially aimed at rallying domestic support and stoking confrontation internationally to conceal the reality that its illegal presence is tightly constrained," Yang said.
China's handling of the Ren'ai Jiao situation, meanwhile, has consistently reflected restraint and humanitarian considerations. According to a statement by the China Coast Guard (CCG) spokesperson on the transfer of injured personnel by the Philippine side, Jiang Lue, a CCG spokesperson, said that on the morning of July 21, out of humanitarian considerations, China allowed the Philippines to transfer injured personnel by small boats from the BRP Sierra Madre (LT-57), which has been illegally grounded at Ren'ai Jiao, to Philippine Coast Guard vessel 9702. The CCG questioned and verified the Philippine vessels and monitored the entire process.
The CCG will continue to carry out rights-protection and law enforcement operations in accordance with the law in the waters around Ren'ai Jiao to safeguard China's territorial sovereignty and maritime rights and interests, Jiang said.
Yang said, stressing that Manila's tough talk and one-sided claims cannot make up for its legal and moral shortcomings.
"Any attempt to permanently occupy Chinese islands and reefs, unilaterally tear up the understanding and continuously challenge China's territorial sovereignty runs counter to international law and the broader trend toward peace and development in the region and is ultimately doomed to fail," Yang added.
。事件曝光后,康保县发布通报,确认视频反映情况属实,系收购商为蔬菜运输保鲜,在装运过程中的违法行为。

B |                           表面上看是为了“卖相”,实则是将利益凌驾于消费者的健康之上,为一己私利出卖良知。这种行为,不是不懂法,而是明知故犯;不是疏忽大意,而是利欲熏心。           “甲醛白菜”,触碰的是民生红线。此次事件曝光后引发了公众的连锁担忧:这样的“甲醛白菜”我们已经吃了多少年?已经流入了哪些地方?除了白菜,还有多少蔬菜可能藏着类似的“保鲜秘方”?食品安全问题之所以牵动人心,正是因为关乎每一个人的一日三餐,关乎最基础的健康保障。

C | 当一颗再普通不过的大白菜都可能成为健康隐患,公众的焦虑便不难理解。           此事也抛出了一个尖锐的追问:既然一位自媒体博主都能发现“甲醛白菜”,监管的“鼻子”为何“嗅不到”?是商家手段高明、蒙混过关,还是日常抽查流于形式、监管存在盲区?监管的缺位,某种程度上纵容了违法者的侥幸心理。           守护食品安全,既要治“标”,更要治“本”。眼下最迫切的,是顺着生产、运输、销售链条一查到底,尽快查清问题白菜流向,最大限度减少危害扩散。同时,必须让违法者付出沉重代价,提高违法成本,彻底“打疼”那些敢在食品安全上动手脚的人。更重要的是,监管必须关口前移,从“事后灭火”转向“事前预防”,在田间地头、在批发市场、在流通环节织密检测网络,让问题农产品无处遁形。           “甲醛白菜”事件再次敲响警钟:食品安全这根弦,任何时候都松不得。唯有以最严谨的标准、最严格的监管、最严厉的处罚、最严肃的问责,才能守护好人民群众“舌尖上的安全”。任何对食品安全的轻视与敷衍,最终都会透支公众信任,付出沉重代价。           让百姓吃得安心,这是最基本的民生工程、民心工程,也是最不容失守的底线。(完) 【编辑:张子怡】。

Current article:http://www.lichuorenrenyitankanmeimu.cfd/dq9eibf/20260826/458981.xlsx

Published on:04:41:16


|