听见你的声音

山东累计实际使用台资313.2亿美元 持续推动鲁台经贸合作走深走实,山东累计实际使用台资313.2亿美元 持续推动鲁台经贸合作走深走实_我的网站

一 |     

    Illustration: Liu Rui/GTA new report funded by Australia's Department of Defense played up security risks to submarine cables in the Indo-Pacific waters and pointed finger at China and some other countries over alleged undersea‑cable attacks in recent years, while claiming threats against subsea cables are growing. A Chinese expert said that accusing China without conclusive evidence constitutes "over‑securitization" made by Australian side, as well as a calculated pretext for its own military expansion.
Published by the National Security College at the Australian National University (ANU), the paper claimed recent damage to cables in the Baltic Sea and around China's Taiwan region suggests "state actors are now actively probing and testing cable infrastructure in peacetime as part of broader hybrid warfare strategies" to rapidly degrade connectivity at the outset of a conflict, The Australian reported.
The paper claimed 16 privately owned subsea cables that carry 99 percent of Australia's internet traffic are a "high priority target" for Australia's adversaries that could be severed in a conflict, threatening the nation's economy and social fabric, according to The Australian.
The report singled out China and Russia for blame, saying that there have been multiple apparent attacks on submarine cables in recent years in European waters as well as near China's Taiwan region, suspected to be linked to Russia and China, the Straits Times reported.
However, the report cites a 2025 voyage by Chinese research vessel Tan Suo Yi Hao along Australia's western and southern coastlines as evidence to back its claim that "potential adversaries are actively gathering information about Australia's cable infrastructure."
This report, relying on the routine scientific operations of a Chinese research vessel in 2025 to level allegations of offensive actions against China, and employing ambiguous terminology such as "suspected" and "potential," demonstrates Australia's evidentiary leap, Chen Hong, director of the Australian Studies Center of East China Normal University, told the Global Times on Monday.
This erroneous claim was refuted by the Chinese Foreign Ministry at the time. Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesperson Guo Jiakun said on March 31, 2025 that China carries out normal activities at sea in accordance with international law, including UNCLOS. 
"We hope Australia will have a right understanding of this and stop the groundless suspicion and speculations," Guo added.
This is not the first time certain Australian politicians has leveled baseless accusations of China intending to sabotage its undersea cables. Back in May, Defense Minister Richard Marles claimed during the Shangri-La Dialogue that China ought to boost transparency around its maritime operations. He also asserted that a surge in damage to subsea cables had transformed the seabed into a "battlefield," per The Australian.
Chen said Australian side's scaremongering is tied to its predictive threat‑perception framework forged in recent years. This framework designates China and other countries as strategic competitors in advance, subsequently forces routine scientific activities into a confrontational framework, Chen said.
Apart from unfounded allegations against China, the paper claims Australia's defense military "must incorporate the defense of submarine cable infrastructure into its operational planning," according to The Australian.
It added the government should also consider up¬grading an auxiliary ship operated by the navy, ADV Guidance, to enable it to repair damaged cables.
The vast majority of submarine cable damages are caused by accidental factors such as fishing operations and vessel anchoring, rather than deliberate sabotage. For suspected cases of intentional damage, independent technical investigation bodies should be established, and the principle of "investigate first, characterize later" should be strictly applied, so as to prevent ordinary maritime accidents from escalating into diplomatic conflicts, Chen said.
The core problem of Australian side's submarine cable security lies entirely with itself. Instead of addressing its own infrastructure shortcomings and improving its domestic protection and maintenance systems, the Australian side has chosen to continually exaggerate external threats and stoke bloc confrontation, the expert added.
Chen said that by fabricating alleged Chinese threats, Australian side seeks to "rationalize" its military spending increases and underwater force expansion. The submarine digital infrastructure originally meant to serve global development has been labeled along us versus them lines, and this constitutes the biggest hidden danger, he added.
。    　　济南8月21日电 (李明芮)山东省人民政府新闻办公室8月21日召开发布会，介绍第30届鲁台经贸洽谈会情况。记者从会上获悉，截至2026年6月，山东累计批准台资项目10000个，实际使用台资313.2亿美元，鲁台经贸合作不断走向深入。8月21日，山东省人民政府新闻办公室召开发布会，介绍第30届鲁台经贸洽谈会情况。

二 | 山东省人民政府新闻办公室供图　　据山东省人民政府台湾事务办公室副主任范存荣介绍，鲁台经贸洽谈会至今已成功举办29届，是大陆举办时间最长的两岸经贸交流活动之一。将于8月31日至9月3日举办的第30届鲁台经贸洽谈会以“乘势奋进‘十五五’　 鲁台共绘新图景”为主题，将面向广大台商台胞充分分享“十五五”时期重大发展机遇，努力构建鲁台融合发展新格局。

三 | “山东将推出‘十五五’时期支持台商台企发展的具体举措，充分展现山东深化鲁台经贸合作的善意诚意。”　　“经过多年培育，鲁台经贸洽谈会已经成为分享机遇的重要窗口、两岸合作的知名品牌和鲁台协作的桥梁纽带，在促进鲁台经贸交流合作方面作用显著。”范存荣表示，多年来，鲁台经贸洽谈会始终立足山东产业发展需求，针对性设计专题对接、参访考察等环节，邀请两岸重要企业、专家、行会来鲁，推动资金、人才、技术等向山东汇聚。　　范存荣称，在鲁台经贸洽谈会的带动影响下，大批台资大企业落户山东，引入了台湾的先进技术，推动了鲁台企业在科技创新、技术攻关等方面的深度合作。“还有大批台资企业被评为国家专精特新‘小巨人’、国家制造业单项冠军企业等，鲁台经贸产业合作的含金量、含新量、含绿量持续提升。

四 | ”　　“服务推进两岸产业合作和经济融合，历来是鲁台经贸洽谈会的核心定位与本质属性。”据潍坊市委常委、副市长狄波介绍，第30届鲁台经贸洽谈会将围绕现代农业、智能制造、绿色化工、海洋经济等重点领域，举办系列产业对接活动。这些产业既是山东基础雄厚、重点发展的核心产业，也是台商台企实现优势互补、落地投资布局的优质赛道。　　“特别是两岸企业家峰会能源及环保节能产业合作推进小组、智能制造及装备产业合作推进小组，将分别直接参与举办绿色化工和智能制造专题活动。

五 | 这两个峰会小组汇聚两岸行业头部资源和高端市场要素，他们的支持赋能，将进一步推动两岸在化工、能源、制造等领域的务实合作，有效助力广大台商台企深度融入山东。”狄波说。　　相比往届，今年的大会专题活动新增海洋经济板块，将举办两岸海洋大健康产业合作恳谈会。狄波称，海洋大健康作为海洋经济与医养健康两大领域融合的新赛道，是鲁台产业合作的新蓝海。恳谈会将聚焦康养产品、海洋医药等重点领域，搭建专家研讨、成果转化、供需对接等交流合作平台，畅通两岸海洋资源协同开发、大健康产业联动发展的路径，以更深层次、更高维度、更优产品惠及两岸同胞。

六 |

Current article:http://www.lichuorenrenyitankanmeimu.cfd/list_cjd/chc73.ppt

Published on:02:53:33